|
|
Post by Hollywood on Jun 25, 2009 14:45:35 GMT -6
Farah Fawcett- IN!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Jun 25, 2009 16:38:45 GMT -6
Now that it seems to be official, Michael Jackson- IN!
|
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Jun 25, 2009 17:29:30 GMT -6
Fawcett IN!
Jackson OUT!
|
|
|
|
Post by Reaper on Jun 25, 2009 17:32:21 GMT -6
Fawcett IN!!
Jackson... he's been dead for years, now its just official, OUT!
|
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Jun 25, 2009 17:52:20 GMT -6
And with that we have a completed Trifecta with Ed McMahon, Misawa, and Farrah Fawcett
|
|
|
|
Post by Bubba JD on Jun 25, 2009 22:04:00 GMT -6
Michael Jackson-IN
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Jun 25, 2009 22:13:32 GMT -6
Alright, the votes are tied at two for Michael Jackson. Either two IN! votes or two OUT! votes will decide if a new trifecta is started by him.
|
|
|
|
Post by fawn on Jun 25, 2009 23:44:47 GMT -6
Jackson- OUT
Sorry but if you do believe in heaven and hell, you know the guy was probably hell bound.
|
|
|
|
Post by greendragon on Jun 26, 2009 9:13:39 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Jun 26, 2009 9:35:14 GMT -6
Poor MJ. No SNW three-bedroom apartment for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Jun 26, 2009 11:02:17 GMT -6
There is justice in the world. On the plus side, Misawa and McMahon get to hit a nice piece for all eternity, as we all know in the Trifecta you are put in the apartment back in your prime(assuming you didn't die as such, then you just stay as you are).
|
|
|
|
Post by emokid on Jun 26, 2009 20:29:25 GMT -6
Aren't we forgetting David Carridine?
|
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Jun 26, 2009 20:44:21 GMT -6
Hmmm, can we put him in? His death was a tad bit far off, Matt you're the almighty diety of Trifecta so it's up to you I reckon
|
|
|
|
Post by Bubba JD on Jun 26, 2009 23:24:11 GMT -6
Carridene wasn't all that long ago. guess it's up for an official ruling.
i'm not going to disagree with anything, regarding his personal behavior. though, depending on the logic you take, there used to be a time when his boy fetishes would've been considered normal. i believe the Roman's & Ancient Greeks often had relationships with young boys, if i'm remembering my history correctly.
|
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Jun 26, 2009 23:44:28 GMT -6
Disturbing as it is, he's right. Back in the Spartan days, they believed that sexual release made a warrior greater. They did not discriminate against gender, so males and males would get it one.
|
|
