|
Post by Hollywood on Sept 3, 2009 15:40:26 GMT -6
Traci Brooks pulled from Playboy » Reported by Adam Martin of WrestleView.com » On Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 12:43 AM EST
According to a report by PWInsider, the photo shoot that TNA Knockout Traci Brooks did for Playboy not long ago will not be appearing in the magazine after all. According to sources, a change in editors at the magazine ended up killing the Brooks photo shoot as this new editor didn't want anything associated between the magazine and pro wrestling. Brooks was scheduled to appear in the fall issue of Playboy this year and this was one of the main reasons she was brought back to TV and put into the Main Event Mafia. However, even though Brooks will not be appearing in the actual magazine, she will be appearing on the "Cyber Club" Playboy website instead later this month. Brooks would have been the first female wrestler outside of WWE to pose for the magazine since they broke ties with WWE.
I made sure to send Playboy a nice little email, which you can do at admin@playboy.com. And if you have access to a fax machine, or want to flood their phone systems:
Phone: 800-276-6048 Fax: 312-642-9228
|
|
|
Post by Chris Angel on Sept 3, 2009 22:45:59 GMT -6
worst news ever. I want her nekkid
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Sept 3, 2009 22:54:17 GMT -6
Well I got the phone and fax number on there. Feel free to clog up their lines! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Chris Angel on Sept 3, 2009 22:57:38 GMT -6
do it for me. international calls have a nasty habit of making money disappear quick.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Sept 3, 2009 23:04:39 GMT -6
Wonder if there's any recourse TNA can take over this. I mean, wouldn't this be a breach of their agreement?
EDIT: Good lord, someone check to make sure it's not raining donuts, because I never thought I'd see the day that I'd be supporting TNA over anything other than pushing Hernandez! lol
|
|
|
Post by Chris Angel on Sept 4, 2009 1:59:49 GMT -6
there's only one way to fix this.
*quickly types up his resume and sends it to Playboy magazine*
|
|
|
Post by fawn on Sept 4, 2009 2:06:22 GMT -6
*Snickers and laughs*
Pissed, angry rednecks are going to be raising hell.
|
|
|
Post by greendragon on Sept 4, 2009 7:46:50 GMT -6
That's IT! I'm cancelling my subscription!
(Note: Just a joke. I never had one. The wife would most likely kill me.)
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Sept 4, 2009 16:02:21 GMT -6
Meh, they'll get out anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Sept 4, 2009 16:03:32 GMT -6
If I'm someone at TNA, I become a vindictive son of a bitch and leak the photos myself, and doing it in such a way that they can't figure out who did. ;D HAHA!
|
|
|
Post by fawn on Sept 4, 2009 19:24:12 GMT -6
If I'm someone at TNA, I become a vindictive son of a bitch and leak the photos myself, and doing it in such a way that they can't figure out who did. ;D HAHA! And TNA wouldn't punish you. I mean if they hadn't punished their top champion for his actions....
|
|
|
Post by sh17 on Sept 4, 2009 19:25:47 GMT -6
TNA really should focus on bigger things than some naked broad. Their world champ being a woman beater, one of their big originals getting pulled over for DUI, the main company man banging said world champion's ex wife, and Vince Russo. All those are much bigger problems that need to be addressed.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba JD on Sept 4, 2009 22:39:08 GMT -6
from what i heard, the reason Playboy pulled the pics from the mag is because TNA didn't do enough to hype this, until it was a bit too late for Playboy to care. no shocker, as far as i'm concerned.
i think the pics will still be available online.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood on Sept 4, 2009 22:52:52 GMT -6
Well they say there's two sides to every story, so if it's really more to do with TNA not promoting it, and less to do with a "new editor," then TNA deserves whatever they get.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba JD on Sept 5, 2009 22:48:37 GMT -6
i've heard both rumors (the new editor & TNA not promoting enough). maybe it's a combination of both problems. whenever a problem is started, there's bound to be different versions of the truth. somewhere in all those versions, you'll see bits & pieces of the truth.
|
|